Glorious 39

Ultimately, I think “Glorious 39″ would be better as a band name.

IMDB Plot Synopsis A mysterious tale set around a traditional British family on the eve of World War Two.

  1. The director nearly had a panic attack in explaining how we’ve never seen a story like this before on screen and that we’ve never seen a story like this told this way either. Most World War II movies are about heroics and successful military operations and whatnot whereas this focuses on the movement in Britain to appease Hitler in the years leading up to the outbreak of World War II. [Which is amusing in relation to other movies where they bitch about American isolationism as a political strategy in 1939. Jesus.]

    The story unfolds as a mystery/thriller rife with “who’s that lurking round the corner” shots as we slowly unravel who are the players are and who is on what side of the argument. The problem with this movie is, though, that it sort of skims along the surface of the politics and is more focused on the drama spent convincing the protagonist, Anne, that she’s crazy and that her family is not involved in the conspiracy. It’s kind of a waste, considering this is an icky side of World War II politics that you rarely see in film and so you leave wishing it had been explored more.

    It reminded me a lot in places of The Good Shepherd with all the covert operations designed to procure a specific outcome to the war and the paranoia and career ruin that comes with it when there is a single misstep, but it failed to engage me in the same way, specifically because Anne is supposed to be left entirely in the dark and to only come upon information as it becomes necessary as part of the plot. We don’t see enough of the collusion or enough of the political dominoes to really get a sense of the magnitude of the impact appeasement will have on Britain and the continent.

    I’m not convinced that mystery/thriller is the genre for this story.

  2. The irony is, of course, that if her family hadn’t been so hell bent on preventing Anne from finding out what was going on, she likely would have continued to turn a blind eye to politics and stayed in her cocooned world of celluloid. It’s only once they started behaving suspiciously (and, yeah, her friends turning up dead) that she started taking notice.
  3. I was hoping it would be revealed that Jeremy Northam’s creepy character was actually a good guy trying to help Anne, but this was not to be.
  4. Christopher Lee! I got pretty excited when we heard his voice over the intercom.
  5. I don’t entirely understand the ending. The story is bookended by Anne’s sister Celia’s grandson coming to talk to Anne’s and Celia’s now elderly cousins, the only ones who are alive who were around during the war. The grandson wants to find out what happened to Anne because it’s this big mystery and he’s just trying to finish his genealogy project for school, damnit. So they launch into the whole story of their family in 1939.

    Fast forward to what happens once Anne finds out too much information. Her family hold her captive in their London home, drugging her food to keep her fuzzy and thinking she’s physically ill rather than being on the brink of figuring out their conspiracy. Eventually her ineffectual mother apparently leaves the door unlocked and Anne simply walks out of the house and down the street, where at a park she runs into her captors who speak to her nonchalantly and don’t seem distraught at all that she’s clearly escaped their clutches. At this point, I thought she had died from lack of nourishment and that this was a death dream like at the end of Titanic, where she was coming face to face with her now dead family in order to turn her back on them and escape in death the way she could not in life. Except then we come back to the present where the grandson drags his grandmother’s cousins to Ye Olde Retirement Home round the corner where his mother is pushing an old woman in a wheel chair. Naturally, the old woman is Anne and — contrary to the old codgers’ belief that she died in Canada twenty years previous — she’s been in England the whole time! And, more importantly, that she apparently sent her sister’s grandson to get the story of what happened to Anne from the cousins so she could hear them say it in their own words, as if she is personally holding them responsible for the atrocities her family inflicted on her. Nevermind that the elder of the two was like nine when it happened. WTF.

  6. I think what I really love about clothing from the 1940s and 1950s is that it looks tailored. Well put together. It’s a shame clothing doesn’t look like that anymore.
  7. There was a weird and unnecessary subplot where Anne was a Romany baby adopted by the family before they had their biological children and thus they didn’t actually love her and presumably this made it easier for them to do terrible things to her? I don’t know. She had this bizarre “OMG I’M A GYPSY” outburst and ultimately I’m not sure why she couldn’t have been “different” from the rest of them without being adopted.
  8. For some unknown reason, Anne was also nicknamed “Glorious”.
  9. I don’t understand why directors will come on stage before the film and give a ten minute introduction instead of sticking around afterwards to give a ten minute Q&A. This happened first at Whip It (although I’d say Drew Barrymore’s intro was more than ten minutes) and now at this movie with Stephen Poliakoff. I can understand not wanting to sit through the film the second time it screens since you’ve already done that on opening night, but instead of introducing the film and then leaving, why not just come in at the end for the Q&A? This annoys me. I prefer it when the directors/stars don’t come at all rather than dangling the tantalising potential for a Q&A in my face like that.
  10. Bill Nighy and Romola Garai were also there at the start of the film. Bill Nighy was amusing and charming in an eccentric way; when they introduced him, he came on stage and made a bizarre air guitar motion before going to the microphone and saying something like “I’m not sure why I just did that peculiar air guitar thing…” I kind of love him. He also said that having been an octopus, a vampire, and a zombie in the past, it might be new and different to see him in a normal role like this. I suppose, of course, that one could stretch the definition of “monster” to fit those who would appease Hitler rather than opposing him. Haha.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>